Skip to main content

Seaweed Cultivation: A Cost-Effective Strategy for Food Production in a Global Catastrophe

  • M. Hinge, V. A. Grilo, F. U. Jehn, J. B. García Martinez, F. J. Dingal, M. Y. Roleda, D. Denkenberger
Pre-print available online from:
02 August 2024

Summary

Hinge et.al (2024) analyze the feasibility and cost of producing edible seaweed during a severe 150 Tg nuclear winter scenario, where conventional crop yields would plummet. They estimate production costs between $400-450 per dry tonne, higher than current prices, but argue that large-scale seaweed farming could significantly contribute to global nutrition post-disaster, either through direct consumption or as animal feed.

Abrupt Sunlight Reduction Scenario (ASRS), Nuclear winter, Economic analysis, Food & supply chains, Aquaculture (inc. seaweed, fishing), Cost-effectiveness

Abstract

An event such as a large volcanic eruption, nuclear winter or asteroid/comet impact has the potential to seriously reduce incoming sunlight, impacting both the global climate and conventional crop yields. This could have catastrophic impacts on human nutrition, unless the food system can adapt. One possible answer is seaweed, where growth is projected to be less impacted (or even enhanced) by the climate shock due to overturning of the ocean bringing nutrients to the surface. We assess the expected cost of producing dry edible seaweed under the climatic conditions of a severe 150 Tg nuclear winter, using Gracilaria Tikvahiae as a benchmark species. To do this we incorporate projected yields and estimated costs under either a capital intensive or labor intensive model, covering both the cost of cultivation and drying. Overall, we find that seaweed costs would range between $ 400-450/dry tonne for the highest yielding/lowest labor cost clusters, and could potentially be produced in significant quantities even when constrained to shallow waters close to ports. This cost is higher than the current reported ~$300-350/dry tonne price of Gracilaria tikvahiae, reflecting additional capital costs and additional drying requirements during the catastrophe. The cost is also higher than current staple cereal prices on a caloric equivalent. However, given the sharp rise in food prices expected post disaster, it is likely a large scaleup would be justified, offering an important contribution to global nutrition, either via direct consumption or when used as animal feed.

Related publications

Global industrial disruption following nuclear war

Resilient foods for preventing global famine: a review of food supply interventions for global catastrophic food shocks including nuclear winter and infrastructure collapse

The impact of abrupt sunlight reduction scenarios on renewable energy production

Subscribe to the ALLFED newsletter