Skip to main content

Review of potential high-leverage and inexpensive mitigations for reducing risk in epidemics and pandemics

  • D. Manheim, D. Denkenberger
Published in Journal of Global Health Reports on:
20 April 2024

Summary

This paper explores under-researched mitigation strategies for epidemics and pandemics, identifying interventions that could significantly reduce their impact. It evaluates mitigations such as improving hygiene, altering norms for high-risk professions, and enhancing disaster resilience. Further research and preparation to address both routine and extreme disease outbreaks effectively is needed.

Abstract

There are potentially promising mitigation activities for epidemic and pandemic scenarios that are not currently the subject of significant research effort. Large epidemics and pandemics pose risks that are important to mitigate, even if the likelihood of the events is low and uncertain. While some efforts are the subject of extensive funding and consideration, other approaches are neglected. Here, we consider such neglected interventions which could significantly reduce the impact of such an epidemic or large-scale pandemic. These are identified via a narrative literature review of extant literature reviews and overviews of mitigations in epidemic and pandemic situations, followed by consideration of the economic value of information of further study of heretofore neglected interventions and approaches. Based on that analysis, we considered several classes of mitigations, and conducted more exploratory reviews of each. Those discussed include mitigations for (i) reducing transmission, such as personal protective equipment and encouraging improved hygiene, (ii) reducing exposure by changing norms and targeted changes for high-risk or critical professions and activities, (iii) reducing impact for those infected, and (iv) increasing large scale resilience using disaster and infrastructure continuity planning. Some proposed mitigations are found to be of low marginal value. Other mitigations are likely to be valuable, but the concepts or applications are underdeveloped. In those cases, further research, resources, or preparation are valuable for mitigating both routine and extreme disease outbreak events. Still more areas of research are identified as having uncertain value based on specific but resolvable uncertainties. In both of the latter cases, there is no guarantee that mitigations identified as worthy of further consideration will be valuable, but the argument for further research is clear

Related publications

Wood Gasification: A Promising Strategy to Extend Fuel Reserves after Global Catastrophic Electricity Loss

The Fragile State of Industrial Agriculture: Estimating Crop Yield Reductions in a Global Catastrophic Infrastructure Loss Scenario

U.S. Potential of Sustainable Backyard Distributed Animal and Plant Protein Production during and after Pandemics

Subscribe to the ALLFED newsletter