Skip to main content

Potential of microbial electrosynthesis for contributing to food production using CO₂ during global agriculture-inhibiting disasters

  • J. B. García Martínez, M. M. Brown, X. Christodoulou, K. A. Alvarado, D. C. Denkenberger
Published in Cleaner Engineering and Technology on:
30 May 2021

Summary

A sun-blocking catastrophe could lead to a collapse in the global agricultural system. García Martínez et al. (2021) assess the potential of acetic acid (vinegar) derived from carbon dioxide via powering microbes with electricity as an alternative (now known as resilient) food. Ultimately, vinegar produced this way is not currently recommended as a resilient food because it is significantly more expensive and resource intensive than other resilient foods such as sugar from wood or protein from natural gas.

Abrupt Sunlight Reduction Scenario (ASRS), Nuclear winter, Cost-effectiveness

Abstract

A sun-blocking global catastrophic risk (GCR) such as a nuclear winter could completely collapse the agricultural system. Producing alternative foods through methods requiring little to no sunlight has been identified as a costeffective response to these types of GCRs. This preliminary techno-economic assessment evaluates the potential of acetic acid (AA) derived from carbon dioxide (CO2) via microbial electrosynthesis (MES) as an alternative food source for GCRs. Production and retail costs are estimated using net present value analyses for catastrophe and non-catastrophe scenarios. Based on nonstop (24/7) facility construction, the speed of food production ramp-up is estimated from capital expenditures using a reference class forecasting correlation. Potential production bottlenecks are assessed via a global resource requirement analysis. In regular conditions, the production cost of AA produced via MES is estimated at $1.83–$5.20/kg (dry). MES production ramp-up is expected to fulfill less than 1% of global human caloric requirements by the end of the first year after the catastrophe. The retail cost of AA produced via MES in catastrophe conditions is estimated at $6–$15/kg (dry). Potential bottlenecks to rampup include high electricity use and platinum dependency, which could be palliated via alternative processes based on gasification or bioelectrodes. AA from MES is not currently recommended as an alternative food for GCRs, because it is significantly more expensive and resource intensive than alternatives. Future research may change this, and could perhaps even enable MES as a sustainable food production method outside of catastrophes, given its potential for CO2 utilization.

Related publications

Resilient foods for preventing global famine: a review of food supply interventions for global catastrophic food shocks including nuclear winter and infrastructure collapse

The impact of abrupt sunlight reduction scenarios on renewable energy production

Food System Adaptation and Maintaining Trade Could Mitigate Global Famine in Abrupt Sunlight Reduction Scenarios

Subscribe to the ALLFED newsletter